Back to Research Library
    Reviewed guideResearch Library / MOTS-c

    MOTS-c: what the evidence shows so far.

    A source-aware guide to an investigational mitochondrial-derived peptide, the difference between endogenous biomarker research and administered exposure, and the questions the current record cannot answer.

    How to read this guide

    Keep the evidence tier, exposure type, population, endpoint, timeframe, comparator, source type, and limitation attached to every result. A biological signal is not automatically a clinical result.

    01 / Definition

    What is MOTS-c?

    MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid mitochondrial-derived peptide. It originates from a short open reading frame within mitochondrial 12S rRNA, also called MT-RNR1. That origin is a useful identity statement, not evidence that administering the peptide produces a clinical benefit.

    Most human records discussed below measure endogenous MOTS-c in blood or tissue, or examine associations with exercise, age, body composition, or disease status. They do not administer native MOTS-c. Endogenous biomarker changes therefore cannot be used as proof that an administered peptide works, is safe, or causes the observed changes.

    01

    Mitochondrial origin

    A short open reading frame within mitochondrial 12S rRNA / MT-RNR1.

    02

    Peptide identity

    A 16-amino-acid peptide described in discovery and preclinical records.

    03

    Exposure boundary

    Endogenous measurement is different from administered native MOTS-c exposure.

    02 / Discovery and preclinical evidence

    Discovery work begins in cells and models.

    The 2015 Lee paper established the discovery and preclinical foundation for MOTS-c. Its cell and mouse experiments can support hypotheses about mitochondrial signaling and metabolic regulation. They are not human evidence, and they do not establish a dose, route, formulation, safety profile, or clinical outcome.

    Later mouse and cell work, including the Reynolds paper, expanded questions about exercise, physical decline, and muscle homeostasis. Those mechanistic hypotheses remain separate from the small human biomarker components and from the recruiting native-MOTS-c trial.

    01Cell Metabolism 2015 / PMID 25738459
    View source

    Lee et al., Cell Metabolism 2015 discovery record

    Population / design
    Cell experiments and mouse models; not a human efficacy trial.
    Timeframe
    Discovery and preclinical work reported in 2015.
    Endpoint
    MOTS-c expression and experimental metabolic phenotypes in cells and mice.
    Comparator
    Experimental cell and mouse comparisons; no administered-human comparator.

    Reported finding: The discovery paper described MOTS-c as a mitochondrial-encoded peptide and reported metabolic-signaling and glucose-handling findings in experimental models.

    Limitation: Cell and mouse findings are preclinical. They do not establish human efficacy, safety, delivery, or clinical outcomes.

    03 / Human biomarker and observational evidence

    The human record is mostly endogenous measurement.

    These cards keep population, design, timeframe, endpoint, comparator, finding, and limitation together. None is a completed native-MOTS-c administration efficacy trial. The Reynolds record includes a small human acute-exercise component, while its broader mouse and cell findings stay in the preclinical tier.

    01Reynolds et al. / Nature Communications 2021 / PMID 33473109
    View source

    MOTS-c is an exercise-induced mitochondrial-encoded regulator of age-dependent physical decline and muscle homeostasis

    Population / design
    Predominantly mouse and cell work, plus an acute-exercise human biomarker component of approximately 10 young men.
    Timeframe
    Acute exercise sampling in the small human component; broader work used experimental models.
    Endpoint
    Endogenous MOTS-c in skeletal muscle and circulation in humans; broader study endpoints included physical-decline and muscle-homeostasis measures in models.
    Comparator
    Exercise-related pre/post or group comparisons; no administered native MOTS-c comparator in humans.

    Reported finding: The human component measured endogenous MOTS-c around acute exercise. The broader mouse and cell findings do not become human anti-aging or performance evidence.

    Limitation: The human component was small and acute, with no native-MOTS-c administration, clinical outcome, or long-term human follow-up. Mouse and cell findings cannot be generalized to people.

    02von Walden et al. / Journal of Applied Physiology 2021 / PMID 34351816
    View source

    Acute endurance exercise stimulates circulating levels of mitochondrial-derived peptides in humans

    Population / design
    30 subjects in endurance, resistance, and control groups, approximately 10 per group; acute exercise study.
    Timeframe
    Pre-exercise baseline, 30 minutes, and 3 hours after exercise.
    Endpoint
    Circulating mitochondrial-derived peptides, including MOTS-c.
    Comparator
    Endurance, resistance, and control group comparisons; no administered native MOTS-c comparator.

    Reported finding: MOTS-c showed a trend toward increase after endurance exercise. The clearest statistically significant circulating result in the abstract was humanin, not a definitive MOTS-c effect.

    Limitation: Acute sampling, small groups, endogenous measurement, and no clinical outcome or native-MOTS-c administration limit interpretation.

    03D’Souza et al. / Aging 2020 / PMID 32182209
    View source

    Increased expression of the mitochondrial derived peptide, MOTS-c, in skeletal muscle of healthy aging men is associated with myofiber composition

    Population / design
    Healthy men in young, middle-aged, and older groups, approximately 26 per group; cross-sectional age-group comparison.
    Timeframe
    Single cross-sectional comparison across age groups.
    Endpoint
    Plasma MOTS-c, skeletal-muscle MOTS-c expression, and associations with myofiber composition and muscle-quality measures.
    Comparator
    Observed age-group comparisons; no administered MOTS-c comparator.

    Reported finding: Plasma MOTS-c decreased with age, while skeletal-muscle MOTS-c expression was approximately 1.5-fold higher in middle-aged and older men than in young men, with associations to slow-type markers and muscle-quality measures.

    Limitation: This was cross-sectional, not longitudinal, and not a treatment study. Associations do not prove an anti-aging effect or causation.

    04Dieli-Conwright et al. / Scientific Reports 2021 / PMID 34413391
    View source

    Effect of aerobic and resistance exercise on the mitochondrial peptide MOTS-c in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors

    Population / design
    Secondary biomarker analysis of a randomized exercise trial with 25 Hispanic and 24 non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors.
    Timeframe
    16-week aerobic/resistance exercise versus usual care.
    Endpoint
    Fasting plasma MOTS-c and associations with body-composition, metabolic, and inflammatory measures.
    Comparator
    Exercise versus usual care and subgroup comparison by ethnicity; no administered native MOTS-c comparator.

    Reported finding: Fasting plasma MOTS-c increased significantly in the non-Hispanic White group but not the Hispanic group, with associations to other body-composition, metabolic, and inflammatory measures.

    Limitation: This small secondary analysis has subgroup and association limitations. It does not establish an administered-peptide effect or a clinical outcome.

    05Kong et al. / Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2025 / PMID 40855115
    View source

    Mitochondrial-encoded peptide MOTS-c prevents pancreatic islet cell senescence to delay diabetes

    Population / design
    Human observational component with 45 people with type 2 diabetes and 19 healthy controls; most exposure and treatment work was in mice, islets, or cells.
    Timeframe
    Fasting serum comparison at a single observational assessment.
    Endpoint
    Serum MOTS-c concentration.
    Comparator
    People with type 2 diabetes versus healthy controls; no administered native MOTS-c comparator.

    Reported finding: Fasting serum MOTS-c was lower in the diabetes group than in healthy controls.

    Limitation: The human result is an association. Most exposure and treatment findings were preclinical and do not show that MOTS-c prevents or treats diabetes.

    04 / Human evidence limits

    What these human records cannot fill in.

    As of August 22, 2026, no completed native-MOTS-c efficacy result was identified in the verified primary records checked. More precisely, no completed interventional efficacy evidence for administered native MOTS-c was identified. These human records measure endogenous levels or associations. They do not provide human safety, pharmacokinetic, delivery, durability, or clinical-outcome conclusions for administered native MOTS-c.

    NCT07505745 is a recruiting native-MOTS-c Phase 2a study with no posted results. Its registration shows what investigators plan to measure, not what the study found.

    05 / Registered studies

    Registries show plans and status, not conclusions.

    The records below are kept separate from peer-reviewed human findings. Status and enrollment reflect the retrieved records at the August 22, 2026 cutoff, and no unposted sponsor toplines are imported.

    Native versus analog boundary

    NCT07505745 concerns native MOTS-c. NCT03998514 concerns CB4211, a distinct peptide analog of MOTS-c. Their records must not be merged.

    A registered study is not a result.

    NCT07505745Recruiting in the retrieved record
    View registry

    A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamics of MOTS-c (a Mitochondrial-Derived Peptide) in Adults With Prediabetes and Overweight/Obesity.

    Compound boundary
    Native MOTS-c, interventional Phase 2a study.
    Enrollment / location
    Estimated enrollment 120; Shenzhen, China.
    Timing
    Actual start February 2, 2026; estimated primary completion February 14, 2027; estimated completion May 17, 2028; last posted April 1, 2026.
    Planned endpoints
    Primary change from baseline in OGTT-derived Matsuda insulin-sensitivity index at 12 weeks; safety through 16 weeks; secondary HbA1c, fasting and 2-hour glucose, and immunogenicity.

    Registry record: No results posted. This is a planned study question, not an efficacy or safety result.

    Boundary: Until results are posted and evaluated, the registry cannot answer whether administered native MOTS-c improves a clinical outcome or is safe.

    NCT03998514Completed
    View registry

    A Phase 1a/1b Study of Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of CB4211 in Healthy Non-obese Subjects and Subjects With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

    Compound boundary
    CB4211 is a distinct peptide analog of MOTS-c, not native MOTS-c.
    Enrollment
    Actual enrollment 88.
    Planned context
    Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, MRI-PDFF, and antibody endpoints, all analog-only context.

    Registry record: No registry results posted. Sponsor toplines are not imported into this guide.

    Boundary: A completed analog study cannot establish native-MOTS-c efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, or delivery.

    NCT04027712UNKNOWN in the retrieved record, last known active, not recruiting, verified 2019
    View registry

    High On-treatment Platelet Reactivity, Increased B-amyloid and Downregulation of MOTS-c Predict Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a 2-year Follow up Study.

    Design / enrollment
    Observational follow-up; estimated enrollment 120.
    Timeframe
    Two-year follow-up.
    Planned question
    The planned biomarker and mortality question in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    Registry record: No results posted. The registry title is not evidence that MOTS-c predicted mortality.

    Boundary: Status is uncertain, and a planned observational question cannot establish a predictive result or causation.

    NCT01140282Completed
    View registry

    Combined Exercise Program for Early Breast Cancer Survivors.

    Study boundary
    Parent exercise trial for PMID 34413391, not a native-MOTS-c administration trial.
    Enrollment
    Actual enrollment 106.
    Registry result
    No results posted; duration is omitted here because the retrieved record contains an inconsistency.

    Registry record: The registry identifies an exercise program, not an administered MOTS-c study.

    Boundary: It provides context for the later biomarker analysis but cannot establish a MOTS-c efficacy or safety result.

    06 / Safety, pharmacology, and uncertainty

    The safety record has a large unanswered space.

    Verified native-MOTS-c human papers measure endogenous peptide and do not provide safety data for administered native MOTS-c. Human half-life, metabolism, distribution, bioavailability, exposure-response, delivery, immunogenicity, and durability remain unresolved. NCT07505745 lists immunogenicity, but its recruiting record has no posted results.

    Human safety record

    Verified native-MOTS-c human papers measure endogenous peptide and do not provide safety data for administered native MOTS-c.

    Pharmacology still open

    Human half-life, metabolism, distribution, bioavailability, exposure-response, delivery, immunogenicity, and durability remain unresolved.

    Registered immunogenicity endpoint

    NCT07505745 lists immunogenicity among its planned secondary endpoints, but the recruiting record has no posted results.

    Biomarker is not exposure

    An endogenous level or exercise-related change does not tell us what an administered exposure would do, how long it would last, or whether it would produce a clinical outcome.

    No personal-use interpretation

    This evidence gap cannot be filled with dosing, route, formulation, sourcing, or monitoring instructions, which are outside this guide.

    07 / Regulatory and public-record status

    Public records answer a narrow question.

    As of August 22, 2026, no FDA-approved product containing native MOTS-c, no publicly identified FDA NDA/BLA record establishing native MOTS-c as an approved medicine, and no EMA centrally authorized marketing authorization for native MOTS-c were identified in the official records checked. This is a public-record finding, not a statement about confidential applications.

    FDA PCAC briefingOpen record

    The 2026 briefing discusses MOTS-c free base and acetate, the lack of a USP/NF monograph, the fact that neither is a component of an FDA-approved drug, and a staff proposal not to add them to the Section 503A Bulks List. This is not approval, a ban, or permission for personal use.

    Current eCFR, 21 CFR 216.23Open record

    MOTS-c is not listed among the six current Section 503A permitted bulk substances checked at the cutoff. A compounding-list status would still not equal approval.

    FDA bulk compounding contextOpen record

    The current page places “MOTs-C” in a withdrawn-nomination table, not the active Category 2 list. This does not establish approval, prohibition, efficacy, or permission for personal use.

    FDA certain bulk substances safety contextOpen record

    This FDA page is regulatory compounding context. Its inclusion does not establish that native MOTS-c is approved, prohibited, effective, or permitted for personal use.

    Drugs@FDAOpen record

    No MOTS-c product record was identified in the checked public database at the cutoff. Drugs@FDA has coverage caveats, and this is a public-record finding, not a statement about confidential applications.

    EMA Medicine FinderOpen record

    No EMA centrally authorized marketing authorization for native MOTS-c was identified in the official EMA records checked. This wording does not address every national authorization.

    08 / Known versus unresolved

    Keep the record beside the open questions.

    Known in this record

    MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded by a short open reading frame within mitochondrial 12S rRNA / MT-RNR1.

    A 2015 discovery paper provides a preclinical cell and mouse record, not administered-human efficacy evidence.

    Human records include endogenous biomarker observations and associations in defined populations.

    NCT07505745 is a registered native-MOTS-c Phase 2a study, and CB4211 remains a clearly separate analog.

    At the cutoff, no completed interventional efficacy evidence for administered native MOTS-c was identified in the verified primary records checked.

    Still unresolved

    Administered-human efficacy and patient-important clinical outcomes

    Human safety, half-life, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and exposure-response

    Delivery, formulation, bioavailability, immunogenicity, and long-term durability

    Whether endogenous biomarker associations are causal or clinically meaningful

    Results from NCT07505745 and the current status of every registered record

    Current regulatory status beyond the public records checked at the cutoff

    09 / Reader checklist

    Questions to carry into the next record.

    01

    Identify the evidence tier: discovery/preclinical, human biomarker, observational, interventional, registry, or regulatory record.

    02

    Ask whether the exposure was endogenous or administered, and do not treat an endogenous level as a drug exposure.

    03

    Keep the population, design, endpoint, comparator, and timeframe attached to every finding.

    04

    Separate association from causation, especially for age, exercise, diabetes, and mortality-related biomarkers.

    05

    Distinguish native MOTS-c from CB4211 and other analog compounds.

    06

    Check whether a registry is recruiting, completed, or unknown, and whether results are posted.

    07

    Read the registry title as a planned question, not as a result.

    08

    Recheck current FDA, eCFR, Drugs@FDA, and EMA records whenever this guide is materially updated.

    09

    Keep a public-record finding separate from claims about confidential applications or personal use.

    10

    Keep the Axiolume review boundary visible: source coverage, evidence limits, disclosures, and general education.

    10 / Source trail

    Follow the primary and official records.

    The source trail separates discovery and preclinical work, human biomarker and observational papers, the CB4211 analog boundary, ClinicalTrials.gov records, and regulatory or public-record sources. Dates identify publication or retrieval context at the August 22, 2026 cutoff. The optional partner resource is not part of this trail.

    Discovery / preclinical

    Direct links / dated

    Lee et al., Cell Metabolism 2015, PMID 25738459

    Publication: 2015; accessed August 22, 2026.

    Reynolds et al., Nature Communications 2021, PMID 33473109

    Publication: 2021; accessed August 22, 2026.

    Human biomarker / observational

    Direct links / dated

    von Walden et al., Journal of Applied Physiology 2021, PMID 34351816

    Publication: 2021; accessed August 22, 2026.

    D’Souza et al., Aging 2020, PMID 32182209

    Publication: 2020; accessed August 22, 2026.

    Dieli-Conwright et al., Scientific Reports 2021, PMID 34413391

    Publication: 2021; accessed August 22, 2026.

    Kong et al., Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2025, PMID 40855115

    Publication: 2025; accessed August 22, 2026.

    Analog boundary

    Direct links / dated

    ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03998514, CB4211

    Registry record; retrieved August 22, 2026.

    ClinicalTrials.gov

    Direct links / dated

    NCT07505745, A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamics of MOTS-c (a Mitochondrial-Derived Peptide) in Adults With Prediabetes and Overweight/Obesity.

    Registry record; retrieved August 22, 2026.

    NCT03998514, A Phase 1a/1b Study of Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of CB4211 in Healthy Non-obese Subjects and Subjects With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

    Registry record; retrieved August 22, 2026.

    NCT04027712, High On-treatment Platelet Reactivity, Increased B-amyloid and Downregulation of MOTS-c Predict Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a 2-year Follow up Study.

    Registry record; retrieved August 22, 2026.

    NCT01140282, Combined Exercise Program for Early Breast Cancer Survivors.

    Registry record; retrieved August 22, 2026.

    Regulatory / public record

    Direct links / dated

    FDA PCAC briefing

    Official public record; checked August 22, 2026.

    Current eCFR, 21 CFR 216.23

    Official public record; checked August 22, 2026.

    FDA bulk compounding context

    Official public record; checked August 22, 2026.

    FDA certain bulk substances safety context

    Official public record; checked August 22, 2026.

    Drugs@FDA

    Official public record; checked August 22, 2026.

    EMA Medicine Finder

    Official public record; checked August 22, 2026.

    11 / Closing disclosure

    Keep the boundary visible.

    MOTS-c remains an investigational topic, and no completed interventional efficacy evidence for administered native MOTS-c was identified in the verified primary records checked at the August 22, 2026 cutoff. Axiolume reviewed this guide for source coverage, evidence boundaries, and disclosures. This is general health education, not medical advice, treatment guidance, a personal-use recommendation, medical or legal review, peer review, or regulatory approval. Sources, registry status, and regulatory records should be rechecked whenever the guide is materially updated.

    Axiolume provides general health education. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, dosing, protocols, treatment recommendations, sourcing, or individualized guidance, and it does not encourage personal use of MOTS-c or CB4211.